Comments on: Supreme Court Verdict: Thaksin 2 Years in jail, Pojamarn not guilty http://pad.vfly.net/en/449/thaksin-2-years-in-jail-pojamarn-not-guilty/ People's Alliance for Democracy Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:21:30 +0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=566e99708b06b9f9e75e3ec5b4986246&size=40&default=http://pad.vfly.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/4a748f3789d1665.png" alt="ronayos Identicon Icon" height="40" width="40" /> ronayos http://pad.vfly.net/en/449/thaksin-2-years-in-jail-pojamarn-not-guilty/comment-page-1/#comment-56 ronayos Identicon Icon ronayos Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:06:17 +0000 http://pad.vfly.net/?p=449#comment-56 (4) Thaksin said the charges were politically motivated and that he had expected the Supreme Court to sentence him. He was correct because if the judges had taken it financially, rather than politically with Thaksin's bribe, the verdict would have gone another way, i.e., acquiting Thaksin. Thaksin should know better already that mourning through international media is useless as the insider deal with the government by any high ranking political position is not allowed in the democratic countries like in UK and USA. An equivalent example is the American Martha Stewart, the cooking master was jailed because of the insider trading in American stock market. (5)<b>Potjaman is not going free from the conviction by this Supreme Court</b>, however, since she is still subjected to be sued under the criminal laws in the usual criminal court because she was either the actual culprit or the supporter for Thaksin in committing this criminal action. She deserves to have her money seized either by the <b>too-eager Tax revenue office</b> or at the request of the attorney general to the criminal court. <b>http://www.antithaksin.com </b> (4) Thaksin said the charges were politically motivated and that he had expected the Supreme Court to sentence him. He was correct because if the judges had taken it financially, rather than politically with Thaksin’s bribe, the verdict would have gone another way, i.e., acquiting Thaksin. Thaksin should know better already that mourning through international media is useless as the insider deal with the government by any high ranking political position is not allowed in the democratic countries like in UK and USA. An equivalent example is the American Martha Stewart, the cooking master was jailed because of the insider trading in American stock market.

(5)Potjaman is not going free from the conviction by this Supreme Court, however, since she is still subjected to be sued under the criminal laws in the usual criminal court because she was either the actual culprit or the supporter for Thaksin in committing this criminal action. She deserves to have her money seized either by the too-eager Tax revenue office or at the request of the attorney general to the criminal court.

http://www.antithaksin.com

]]> By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=566e99708b06b9f9e75e3ec5b4986246&size=40&default=http://pad.vfly.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/4a748f3789d1665.png" alt="ronayos Identicon Icon" height="40" width="40" /> ronayos http://pad.vfly.net/en/449/thaksin-2-years-in-jail-pojamarn-not-guilty/comment-page-1/#comment-52 ronayos Identicon Icon ronayos Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:10:10 +0000 http://pad.vfly.net/?p=449#comment-52 (3) Moreover, this verdict has indirectly proved that, even against the Thaksin's brother-in-law, Somchai, the Courts are independent as well as the state is stable enough. This could disproof the fabricated reasons in the <b>Shinawatras' application forms for asylum in UK.</b> (3) Moreover, this verdict has indirectly proved that, even against the Thaksin’s brother-in-law, Somchai, the Courts are independent as well as the state is stable enough. This could disproof the fabricated reasons in the Shinawatras’ application forms for asylum in UK.

]]> By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=566e99708b06b9f9e75e3ec5b4986246&size=40&default=http://pad.vfly.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/4a748f3789d1665.png" alt="ronayos Identicon Icon" height="40" width="40" /> ronayos http://pad.vfly.net/en/449/thaksin-2-years-in-jail-pojamarn-not-guilty/comment-page-1/#comment-51 ronayos Identicon Icon ronayos Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:19:09 +0000 http://pad.vfly.net/?p=449#comment-51 <b>This is one of the best verdicts from various supreme courts of Thailand which include the verdict on Samak's conflict of interests, Thai Rak Thai Party's Dissolution</b> on top of another best one from the lower criminal court in Potjaman's tax frauds</b> (1) This verdict has set a standard for the cabinets, not to be personally involved or influence in the state's deals by any means. ( From now on, politicians have to be very careful with their declaration of their assets, their family's deal with the state and any conflict of interests with the state. Any crooks will have to keep an eye on their taxes while hiding their corrupted money.) (2) It has obviously and definitely disproved Thaksin Shinawatra's lies, accusing the courts not providing fair trials for his family. <b>First</b>, the verdict, strictly followed the laws, was postponed for a month because of the absence of the two accused. <b>Second</b>, the court justly lifted the charge for Potjaman. <b>Third</b>, the court justly lifted the charge of the violation of 157 and 158 criminal laws as Thaksin was not the officer who carried out the land auction process. However, this would certainly urge the crooked Thaksin's cronies to retaliate against the courts (such as an explosion at the house of the Chief Administrative Court Judge the night before.) as well as the attempt to amend the constitution to launder Thaksin Shinawatra's family. This is one of the best verdicts from various supreme courts of Thailand which include the verdict on Samak’s conflict of interests, Thai Rak Thai Party’s Dissolution on top of another best one from the lower criminal court in Potjaman’s tax frauds
(1) This verdict has set a standard for the cabinets, not to be personally involved or influence in the state’s deals by any means. ( From now on, politicians have to be very careful with their declaration of their assets, their family’s deal with the state and any conflict of interests with the state. Any crooks will have to keep an eye on their taxes while hiding their corrupted money.)
(2) It has obviously and definitely disproved Thaksin Shinawatra’s lies, accusing the courts not providing fair trials for his family. First, the verdict, strictly followed the laws, was postponed for a month because of the absence of the two accused. Second, the court justly lifted the charge for Potjaman. Third, the court justly lifted the charge of the violation of 157 and 158 criminal laws as Thaksin was not the officer who carried out the land auction process.

However, this would certainly urge the crooked Thaksin’s cronies to retaliate against the courts (such as an explosion at the house of the Chief Administrative Court Judge the night before.) as well as the attempt to amend the constitution to launder Thaksin Shinawatra’s family.

]]>